📌 “Not all m
共 33 條紀錄
“Not all men” but 62 million of you?????
62 Mio are 0,77% of all men auf the World. So Yes not all men
62 million includes men and women. And not even unique users to a site that mostly has legal porn. Is it correct to call threads users prostitution supporters because threads has an OF bot epidemic?
1000 people (majority of men, some women) have been found on a SA telegram group. They proceeded to post videos, hiding them among legal content, on a website with 62M total visits (from mixed genders) per month.
1000 people should be arrested.
I mean it's 62 million views. Men and women access porn daily. So no, not all men. Not even 62 million.
Apparently it's was 1000 people.
If Walmart App had 62 million hits did every hit search for feminine care products?
Unfortunately not all men is still alot of men that do... even if the percentage is low.. the numbers are not.. and it's disgraceful and disgusting...
We don’t even know it was all men. We don’t really know much.
62 millions are men and women. And women make up for 40% of the users. Beside 60% of 62mil is 37.2 mil, which out of 4.17bil men is 0.89% so it's definitely not all men and that's assuming 1 user only got 1 view.
Gay men aren’t part of this. Perhaps we signify that difference in the actual phrasing of the thing
You literally don't know that, you have no idea who visited thay site, gay, straight, or whatever.
You literally don't know, so you can't say gay men aren't part of it, you can say you're not part of it, sure that's fine.
These people just read headlines and run here to post. Plus the article came out in March and everybody is just not talking about it which is how I know you didn't even read it you're just repeating what someone else said
No…
“The website, which had around 62 million visits in February alone and whose core audience is in the United States, describes itself as a “moral free file host where anything legal is hosted forever.””
62 million VISITS on the website that hosted the content, among other things.
Yea and the video in question had 50k views but these hoes will pull 62 million out of their loose assholes
What did those 62 million do?
Yeah we need to bring back burning at the stake for those 62 million.
People should also be aware that traffic data can be misleading. Tools like VPNs, proxies, and compromised devices can make activity appear to come from ordinary users in places like Florida, even when it’s actually coming from somewhere else, such as India.
This is a common practice.
So if a location shows thousands of visits to a site, it doesn’t necessarily mean those users are physically there. Some of that traffic could be masked or routed through other people’s devices.
62 million people visited the site.
Would be less, but some of you keep saying NO
I think you meant to say "1000 of you"
Sb explain. I heard abt this and forgot and i cant get info abt this anywhere
Website visits count every time a page refreshes, this was not 62 individual men, more accurate reports put the unique user count closer to 1500 whoch is still disgusting, arrest them all, but dont promote this false narrative.
As i read, it seems to be fake news eventually.
On one site in one month only, so the real number is a LOT bigger.
Don’t blame porn. Learn math. Go kids, study.
Are you trying to look dumb, or is it something you can't help?