I feel like Belle would've been a lot less disappointed if Beast looked like this instead.

I get why they made him baby faced to contrast his beast form but this design really speaks to the soul for me ngl

her reaction when she saw his real face will never not be funny to me. forever.

Need to remind y’all what “attractive” was back then. The man on the front of the romance novels back in the day looked like THIS.

This is why the prince came out looking the way he did.

The only artist who I feel captured how Disney tried to portray Prince Adam after his transformation is Jirka Väätäinen. This is how I imagined him, beautifully handsome!

I would hatẹ both 😅

This makes much more sense, but the original human version is HANDSOME , GORGEOUS and PERFECT.

Makes zero sense actually the beast was a curse, the prince never looked beast like so why would his human self look similar to a beast at all

I think human beast is fine idk why people have a problem with him. Yeah, he’s not like, a complete stud. So what. The point of the movie is not to judge people on their appearances

I feel like it kind of defeats the thesis of the movie if he pops out and doesn’t disappoint her visually

He 💯 should have had a beard

I'VE BEEN TELLING Y'ALL the "is the beast or the prince hotter" debate is literally just "are you into daddy bear older types or pretty boy twinks"

Holy god!!

4 year old me, would’ve been too.

why does bearded human beast look like jake gyllenhaal?

Honestly, I think the beast would look like Tarzans human dad if he had a full beard.

Unfortunately, all the gay animators were busy making Gaston, so they let a straight man make what the thought would be hot to Belle.

Nah, the gay dudes who were into manly men made Gaston, the ones that were into "fairies" made this prince...

He’s a young noble not a veteran warrior 😂

Oh yes. Give me bespectacled man who works out any day

And then they replicated that look in the live action film when they literally had this man playing him?! Like how could they make Dan Stevens unsexy?

As a kid, I used to imagine a live action with young Brenden Frasier playing him lol (look at him as George of the jungle) just dye the hair

Idk what ya'll are actually on about. He looks pretty good for a 21 YEAR OLD. This was the beauty standards at that time anyway.
It's just the angle which looked weird and hence it made him look like that.

This argument and Flynn cutting rapunzel's hair are among the debates that I just don't understand..

also they put hair on his chest, whats cute about that? i dont mean its gross but..

Isn’t the beast supposed to be like 21 tho? What 21 yo dude looks like that? I think the original version is fine

Honestly as a little kid I thought he was more "attractive" as Beast. I'll let you come to your own conclusions about my adult proclivities