檔案總覽
📌 If you wan 共 22 條紀錄
主帖子 @steven_woodrow
❤️ 1164
If you want a better Supreme Court, you need to help elect Democrats to the Senate.
回覆 @jaketheleftist
❤️ 31
Agreed but it isn’t blue no matter who. They need to be carefully selected.

Also America needs to embrace judicial supremacy and ordain a Constitutional Court as a co-equal court to SCOTUS with distributed nominations, high consensus requirements and term limits for its members.

This thing where whoever happens to have a majority in the Senate gets to shape the country via a Supreme Court pick needs to end. It’s a risk to the stability of constitutional governance.
回覆 @kristina3938
❤️ 5
Need at least 60 to be able to expand the court. You need 67 to remove any of the corrupt MAGA judges.
回覆 @biogeoverse
❤️ 3
Help elect staunch *progressives* to the Senate. Them being democrats as a party label is fully secondary.
回覆 @mwells9378
❤️ 0
Bullshit. You clearly have no idea how SCOTUS gets chosen. You need. Dem president first and foremost
回覆 @biogeoverse
❤️ 0
Thank you for your helpful and grammatically astute input.
回覆 @mwells9378
❤️ 1
Leaving “a” is a typo not bad grammar . Why deflect from your false claim?
回覆 @matt.mowen
❤️ 1
I think whe should just pack the SC now since you think it’s a game and should work that way. Repubs and Trump change the rules now , expand the number to 100 and make it that permanently. Thoughts? You know since you think it should be at the whim of those In power at the time
回覆 @mwells9378
❤️ 0
You need a Dem president
回覆 @steven_woodrow
❤️ 0
Correct. But even a Dem President can’t appoint liberal justices and judges without Senate majorities.
回覆 @mwells9378
❤️ 0
Actually it used to be that the elected President has the right to choose and the opposition better have a damned good reason to vote against. Ideology was expected
to match the Presidents.
回覆 @steven_woodrow
❤️ 0
Then along came Mitch McConnell.

And the press let him get away with it.
回覆 @mwells9378
❤️ 0
You are correct on that one. But who we elect for President is all the marbles.
回覆 @pip28180
❤️ 0
Democrats to the senate? Hmmm, being an ex Democrat voter I’d say the Democrats are no longer democrats, and I’d also offer as of late all I’ve seen them do is allow mobs of undocumented people walk in, release know felons to commit more crimes, sack our girls and women with males being girls and women, raise taxes on anything possible, have fraud committed by the billions (California) can’t define a woman, can’t answer if a man can get pregnant. And on and on.
回覆 @jesse_j_gonz
❤️ 0
You’re not American so stfu
回覆 @mwells9378
❤️ 0
Also a Dem president !!
回覆 @mild_sevens_
❤️ 0
Senators don't appoint judges. Democrats don't block Republican appointees.
回覆 @steven_woodrow
❤️ 0
Senators approve or disapprove federal judges. Try to keep up.
回覆 @mild_sevens_
❤️ 0
And i finished with "Democrats don't block Republican appointees" which is true
回覆 @slug.star.custom
❤️ 0
Hell to the no!!!!
回覆 @bonediggy0081
❤️ 0
Democrats should start becoming representatives that people want to vote for then
回覆 @bettytmqn
❤️ 0
I'm sorry, maybe I disturbed you